Looking back on a whirlwind of a first month in session

The opening month of the session was a whirlwind: analyzing how the $1.25 billion COVID Relief Funds were utilized, approving the mid-year budget adjustment, responding to the governor’s priorities for next year’s budget as well as beginning committee deliberations as bills were introduced. 

 Here's some good news on the affordable housing front. In the governor’s budget proposal for next year, an increased allocation of $30.8M is to be used to build more much needed housing. As well, the second federal COVID funding includes $200M that provide continued emergency rental assistance – including utility assistance.  This will most certainly help, as we especially learned this past year, “Housing is Healthcare.”

 I serve on the General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committee. In a joint meeting with the Human Services Committee we heard from a range of housing providers and individuals who have experienced being homeless. Among their recommendations: keep funding flexible to meet a range of current and emerging needs; continue to support collaborative, cross-sector initiatives that strengthen communities in new ways; fund additional emergency and transitional housing; and increase the number of housing vouchers and new case workers. 

 Mental Health Workers and Advocates detailed how unstable housing has only exacerbated issues during the pandemic. Moving people off the streets and out of shelters into hotels in order to mitigate contagion was the right short-term decision at the onset of COVID, but now eleven months into the ongoing crisis, over 2,200 adults and 400 children are still being housed in over 70 hotels across the state.

These are some of our most hyper-vulnerable Vermonters, and the isolation, displacement, and uncertainty compounded in some instances by poverty, trauma, substance use disorder, and/or mental illness has necessitated support services in order to keep residents safe. Criminal behavior, self-harm, and unsanitary conditions add further duress. These efforts are still being supported through federal relief dollars; creating a humane transition post-pandemic will be an enormous challenge.

As it is the beginning of the biennium, dozens of bills were already introduced to our committee, including prevailing wages on school construction projects, political lawn signs, zoning restrictions, organ donors, Homeless Bill of Rights, and a Eugenics Apology Resolution to all Vermonters harmed from state-sanctioned eugenically inspired sterilization programs. More on these if they are taken up for in-depth consideration. Each season, only a select few make it through the legislative process. At this time, priority is being given to time sensitive matters and pandemic recovery.

Other committee briefings included background on the Veteran’s Home, National Guard, and status of the state’s unemployment insurance fund. These reports are key for our work in the months ahead. 

Significant time was spent discussing two proposed bills (H.63 & H.81), both of which propose technical changes to a 2018 bill that created a new statewide healthcare bargaining process for all public school employees. The bills contain several differences, two of which are more significant: whether the parties are allowed to bargain different premiums and out-of-pocket costs for support staff and higher-paid teachers and administrators; and in the ways each would resolve disputes through arbitration. Two members of South Burlington’s School Board, Elizabeth Fitzgerald and Bridget Burkhardt, and Superintendent of Schools, David Young, among dozens of others, gave oral and written comments regarding how the bills would impact local school budgets.

Everybody gains with cultural cross pollination

In 1983, Trisha Brown unveiled her choreographic masterpiece, “Set and Reset,” at BAM’s Next Wave Festival. I was the company’s managing director. Immediately after the premiere, I stuffed my backpack with resplendent reviews, flew to London, and got a Eurorail pass. Art Becofsky from Merce Cunningham’s company had given me a list of European sponsors. I visited cities in England, France, Germany, and Italy meeting with producers, festival directors, and agents. 

It was rather haphazard; nothing was prearranged. Meetings were organized after I arrived and first found a hotel. Somehow it worked, the relationships established during this trip developed into a touring network for the company. Years later, Trisha told me, “Europe gave me my career,” as it had for so many other American artists.

Next stop for me was working as managing director for Christopher Hunt, director of the PepsiCo Summerfare Festival at SUNY Purchase. American debuts of foreign ensembles were central. Highlights included The Stary Theatre of Cracow’s dramatization of Andrzej Wajda’s “Crime and Punishment” (1986) and William Forsythe’s “Artifact” with Frankfurt Ballet (1987). Experiencing these works, live in real time with others, was revelatory.

In 1988, I became curator of performing arts at Walker Art Center in Minneapolis for eight years. International artists diversified programming as well as engendered artmaking in the community. Butoh dancers, Bulgarian singers, Tibetan chanting monks, Cuban jazz legends, Burundi drummers, and Grand Kabuki performers were cheered alongside European choreographers. Neil Bartlett and Bloolips introduced a very particular British camp sensibility, exploding theatrical possibilities for local queer creators.

These virtuosos were curated amongst an intentional community of like-minded presenters and agents who traveled together to see work and be in contact with artists and peers worldwide. My Eurocentric lens broadened through journeys to Australia, Cuba, France, Israel, Ivory Coast, Japan, Mexico, and Russia. 

Experiencing artists’ fully produced work in their home countries was far superior to studio showcases during American booking conferences. And since we were traveling in a group, if a few of us got excited about an artist, a tour became instantly viable. In addition to attending performances, bus rides to the Gulf of Guinea, Guadalajaran drag shows, and overnight trains to St. Petersburg forged lifelong friendships as our world views changed and aesthetics redefined. 

These trips were resource-intensive, but through the intrepid efforts of people like David White and Sam Miller, philanthropic support enabled cohorts of Americans to research artists, network with international administrators, and present an array of worldwide artistry throughout the country. This work was often highly subsidized by foreign governments recognizing the importance of global exchange. 

Furthermore, I taught workshops with colleagues in Bratislava, Buenos Aires, Sofia, Salzburg, Toronto, and Warsaw. American marketing and funding strategies did not always translate; I often learned more than our lesson plans offered. Shared meals and post-performance drinks were as essential as daytime curriculum. In Bytom, while lecturing with Silesian Dance Theatre (1995), I encountered the unmitigated hell of Auschwitz – life changing indeed.

Internationalism was also important while I was executive director at Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco. Chief curator Renny Pritikin invited Japanese sculptor Kenji Yanobe’s robotics (1997) and British filmmaker Isaac Julien’s media installations (2002) to complement the Bay Area focus in its galleries. Alonzo King’s explorations with Shoalin monks and people from the Ituri Rainforest expanded his choreographic range on the stage. 

More recently, I was executive director at Flynn Center in Burlington (retiring in 2018). Artistic director Steve MacQueen programmed Canadian circus groups alongside Angélique Kidjo, Gilberto Gil and Compagnie Hervé Koubi as well as emerging dancemakers from the Congo, Mozambique and Japan. As important, he curated a New Voices series featuring New American immigrant musicians living in the community. Everybody gains with cultural cross pollination. 

Sadly, opportunities for curatorial research travel have diminished considerably and immigration visas became more cumbersome, restrictive and expensive. Consequently, world artists all but disappeared in many presenting seasons. 

With the Biden/Harris administration, I do hope a renewed commitment to the import of internationalism will be rekindled. Philanthropic support will be essential. Open borders are more necessary than ever. 

As the sector rebuilds post-pandemic, composer Arvo Pärt reminds us, “This tiny coronavirus has showed us in a painful way that humanity is a single organism and that human existence is possible only in relation to other living beings.”

First Week of the New Legislative Session

There was so much uncertainty as we returned (virtually) to the legislature last week. Prior to the session, the Joint Fiscal Office detailed upcoming budget pressures, even with a second federal stimulus package. The Democratic Caucus nominated leadership for the biennium and agreed to focus on prioritizing COVID economic recovery. In our second day, following the insurgent storming of the U.S. Capitol, the House passed a resolution aligning with the Governor’s call for President Trump to “resign or be removed from office by his Cabinet or by the Congress.” 

It is an honor to serve as one of four representatives in South Burlington, and I welcome your input. The pandemic’s disproportionate impact on lower income Vermonters ruptured our state’s fraying social safety net and illuminated the extraordinary challenges constituents faced in this profound time of need. Navigating outdated and overwhelmed unemployment online portals as well as the complexity of applying for food, fuel, and housing benefits were some of the frustrating issues shared with me.

I continue serving on the General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committee. Issues of concern include expanding affordable housing and childcare opportunities, strengthening unions, providing a living wage, increasing the number of recovery beds available, and protecting our homeless. Constituents also talked with me about food sensitivity issues. As well, the committee will work with the National Guard and their families during the upcoming deployments. 

As we focus on rebuilding the economy, the critical shortage of affordable housing and childcare must be addressed. More work needs to be done to move our minimum wage to $15 per hour - over 40,000 Vermonters will be impacted. Paid Family and Medical Leave should be reintroduced. If we had access to these benefits, a disproportionate share of women would not have left the workforce. 

The most marginalized cannot be left behind. During the pandemic, 2,126 adults and 386 children who were homeless were moved out of shelters into hotels in order to mitigate contagion. Once the emergency period winds down, it is imperative to have a humane transition plan. This will be daunting, and highlights the need for a more integrated system, from emergency shelters to supportive permanent housing solutions. 

Tragically, last year Vermont set a new record for deaths from overdoses. Recovery homes are a key component of treatment alternatives, providing a shared living residence supporting persons grappling with substance use disorders, prohibits use of alcohol and illegal drugs, and assists residents in accessing support services including medication-assisted treatment. I worked with advocates and stakeholders to strengthen a bill from last session, and will be reintroducing a revision seeking to increase the number of needed recovery beds statewide.

Two other issues I worked on last biennium will hopefully be reintroduced: a Homeless Bill of Rights prohibiting discrimination against people without homes and a Eugenics Apology Resolution to all Vermonters harmed as a result of state-sanctioned eugenically inspired sterilization programs that targeted members of Abenaki bands, Vermonters of mixed racial or French-Canadian heritage, the poor, and persons with disabilities. 

Over the past year, many lessons were learned legislating through COVID. Under-resourced nonprofit service providers, already stretched too thin, partnered in consortiums of community-based groups to heroically meet the dire needs throughout the state. These inter-agency coalitions delivered essential services in regionally-specific ways and will need ongoing support. 

As well, both the House and Senate collaborated across party lines with the Governor to streamline processes and fast track support for Vermonters. As a part-time citizen legislator, I found this to be efficient and effective. The pandemic highlighted the need for a more holistic legislative paradigm breaking down policy silos in both chambers. I look forward to further cooperation in the challenging months ahead. 

Imagining a post-pandemic art world

I attended my first political rally while still in high school at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago. Earlier that year, Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy had been assassinated, many cities were in flames, and antiwar sentiment raged. The convention site was locked down, but I jumped right into the street protests. Television news cameras filmed the police riot that bloodied and bruised us as we chanted, “The whole world is watching.”

Amidst the civil unrest of that decade, an aesthetic revolution was also percolating. Peter Brook’s The Empty Space and Jerzy Grotwoski’s Towards a Poor Theatre called for reimaging a stripped down essentialism. Their credos echoed Anna Halprin’s task-oriented movement and Yvonne Rainer’s No Manifesto. John Cage, Terry Riley, and Ornette Coleman deconstructed compositional notions. Amiri Baraka’s plays called out white racism, New Wave filmmakers embraced quirky realness, and visual artists tossed out all the rules, as art performed life.

By the time I moved to New York in the early 1970s, the next wave of post-modernism was blossoming: Meredith Monk performing in parking lots, Trisha Brown dancing on rooftops, David Gordon improvising with Grand Union at the 14th Street Y, Phillip Glass playing at the Whitney, and Patti Smith singing in St. Mark’s Church. By the next decade, these iconoclasts were appearing in major theaters and opera houses—proof that change oftentimes emanates from the fringes.

Not all was high art. Charles Ludlum’s camp extravaganzas ignited gender-bending hijinks in bars, clubs, and small theaters across the East Village. All was fabulous, nothing was sacred. The annual queer pride parade allowed us all to be theatrical and political.

Today, the convergence of COVID-19 closing down public events, along with the explosive outrage with continued police carnage in communities of color, brings us to a similar inflection point as the late 1960s. Once again, a fundamental shift wherein art is stripped of any pretense is emerging. As well, the enormous chasm between aesthetics and inequity must be addressed as systemic racism is dismantled.

Perhaps it is a gift that we are currently forced to live in a continuous present, with no past, and no future, just now. Artists and organizations are re-examining their practices. Art can no longer be treated solely as a transactional product, with audience as consumers. What is important now is how culture can be essential in our communities.

Makers shifted to online strategies to create, disseminate, help others, and enliven protests. Organizations struggled at first, not realizing their missions were not tied to shuttered galleries and stages. However, many are slowly pivoting to seeing themselves as virtual community centers. Black Lives Matter must also manifest in staffing, governance, and programming within cultural organizations to redress structural racism. Embracing this new normal will have profound impact as we slowly rebuild our social, economic, and civic lives.

We are in this liminal moment imagining a post-pandemic art world. The opportunity in this crisis will be lost, if in hindsight we simply rush to put everything back together the way it was. As Peter Brook reminded us 50 years ago, “I can take any empty space and call it a bare stage.”

Synopsis of Corona Relief Funds

The Vermont General Assembly finalized $1 Billion in federal Corona Relief Funds (CRF) to help Vermonters and to rebuild Vermont's economy and the institutions and systems vital to our quality of life.

  • $76 million dispersed via the Department of Taxes (for businesses that pay Rooms & Meals or Sales taxes) 

  • $76 million dispersed via ACCD working with regional economic development corporations to businesses and nonprofits that do not pay sales, or R&M taxes.  

  • $5.0 million to help women-owned and minority-owned small businesses

  • $5.0 million to assist our creative economy

  • $2.5 million in fund tourism and marketing efforts

  • $3.5 million to Working Lands Enterprise Fund to aid the agriculture, forestry and wood products industry 

  • $1.5 for help outdoor recreation during COVID-19

  • $2.5 million to offer a variety of financial and technical supports to businesses

  • $5.0 million to Restaurants and Farms Feed the Hungry 

  • $25 million to milk producers and processors

  • $5 million to non-dairy producers and processors

  • $5 million to Forest Economy Stabilization Grants

  • $15 million to Local Governments for COVID-19 Reimbursements

  • $1.4 billion to MicroBusiness grants through Community Action Agencies

Millions more will shore up schools, child care, parent child centers, and our health care system. The dollars will provide housing rehabilitation to increase the number of housing units for the homeless and for those in poverty, will help tenants and landlords with eviction and foreclosure protection, provide food for those who are hungry and summer meals for children. Workers will be protected by COVID-19 related workers compensation changes. Essential workers will receive hazard pay. Monies will support our farms and fund broadband build-out, our Vermont State Colleges, the University of Vermont, working lands and conservation.

Strict federal guidelines require the $1 Billion in federal funds be used for Covid-19-related expenses on items not previously budgeted for at the state or local level, and that the funds be spent by December 30, 2020. 

Along with allocating Corona Relief Funds, we continue our work to build a healthier, stronger future for Vermont. During this session, we passed an increase to the minimum wage to put more dollars in the pockets of Vermonters in the coming years. We passed legislation that starts to dismantle systemic and structural racism, hiring a Director of Racial Equity and directing more than $5 Million in Corona Relief Funds to women- and minority-owned businesses and to New Americans.

We look forward to taking action on the Global Warming Solutions Act to make progress on climate change and to taking steps to modernize Act 250. We voted to allocate $7.5 million to our state college system in the Quarter 1 budget. More decisions about higher education, to which $80 million has already been allocated, will take place when we reconvene in August.

The Legislature will return on August 25th. By then we will have received an August 15th updated revenue forecast and the Governor’s Recommended Budget. We stand ready to meet Vermonters' needs because we reserved some CRF funds in anticipation of further requests. We are committed to building a Vermont that works for everyone.

Bill anatomy - recovery residences

Now that COVID-related emergency legislation is winding down, the legislature is returning to bills that had been on the back burner. As housing is within the domain of my committee work, one issue I was working on is how to increase the number of recovery beds available to those grappling with substance use disorders. 

Recovery residences are a key component of treatment alternatives. A 2019 report by Downstreet Housing identified there were only 212 recovery beds state-wide, with the majority in Chittenden County and Brattleboro. However, 73% of the existing beds are for men, despite 42% of those receiving treatment are women, and there is only one recovery residence for women with children. The study identified the need for more than 1,000 additional beds to help communities counter the ever increasing devastation from addiction. 

Representative Jean O’Sullivan has been working on this issue for years and I co-sponsored H.783 with her, a bill whose intention is to improve the quality and increase the number of recovery beds throughout the state. Recovery homes provide a shared living residence supporting persons recovering from a substance use disorder that provides peer support, prohibits use of alcohol and illegal drugs, and assists residents in accessing support services including medication-assisted treatment. 

The bill does not regulate all recovery residences in Vermont, but proposes for homes meeting national standards certified by the Vermont Alliance for Recovery Residences to be exempt from certain landlord and tenant relationships outlined in the bill. The certification process provides a toolkit with state-wide definitions, detailed expectations, and operational policies. This is needed to improve the quality of recovery homes across the state as there are no industry standards. 

The bill also addresses zoning for these homes as single-family residential use. This clarity is essential for both operators and communities, eliminating barriers and discrepancies from town to town, thus allowing homes to be in proximity to transportation, employment, and necessary support services. Vermont did this over 30 years ago for independent living group homes for people with disabilities.

Guidelines and policies for temporary and permanent removal is also addressed to allow a fair due process for both tenants and landlords, balancing individual and community rights. Currently, no standards exist in this arena as well. Under the bill, residents are provided protections. 

This is a very delicate balance as relapses are often part of the recovery process, so safeguards were put into the bill to ensure that people who need to be removed are helped with re-housing and harm reduction strategies consistent with their recovery plans. And importantly, a recovery residence may not remove a resident solely on the use of medication-assisted treatment. 

Certified recovery residences will  benefit from being in this network, including technical support and guidance on best practices. The Vermont Community Foundation announced the formation of the Jenna Fund to be administered by Vermont Association for Recovery Residences and only be available to certified residences in the state. These funds provide initial deposits and first month’s rent for individuals who have financial need.  

Advocates, recovery residence operators, state administrators from departments of health, housing, and corrections, as well as people grappling with substance use disorders helped develop the bill. Responding to input, seven iterations of the bill evolved, and then in committee, two more friendly amendments were integrated. 

The bill is waiting to come before the full House, and may not make it through the process this summer. While working on the issue, I learned recovery homes save lives, and are essential to helping people overcome substance use disorders. Site visits to South Burlington’s exemplary Suburban Square women’s home and Jenna’s Promise being developed in Johnson affirmed the benefits recovery residences provide.  Hopefully, the time will be right to act upon this bill.

The arts are essential businesses

The economic damage to our arts organizations is profound and will be long-lasting. Theaters, museums, galleries, music clubs, and community art centers were the first to close in the pandemic and will be the last to open. Vermont Arts Council and Vermont Humanities Council surveyed the field and found the cultural sector has already lost $14.4 million with future losses estimated at $21 million with no opening dates in sight.  

As Covid-19 forces us to live in a continuous present, planning has been impossible. Performances and gallery exhibitions scheduled months, even years in advance, were canceled, and future events are tentative at best. Thousands of arts workers lost their jobs and performing artists that depend on touring lost all income for 2020.

The creative sector employed more than 40,000 in our state. Arts organizations have been economic anchors for downtown businesses. When I ran the Flynn Center in Burlington for eight years, I can attest that the 1,400-seat theater often provided 500+ diners at near-by restaurants, in addition to customers for neighboring bars and coffee shops. 

Rutland’s Paramount Theatre and Brattleboro Museum and Art Center, along with other venues across the state are economic drivers in their communities as well. Vermont Arts Council’s latest estimate of event-related spending by cultural audiences totaled $44 million (not including ticket income) – a very significant amount for downtown businesses.

Summer festivals won’t be happening this year, and they will be sorely missed by residents and tourists in Dorset, Putney, Guilford, Weston, St. Johnsbury, and other towns. Mainstage venues in White River Junction, Barre, Montpelier, Burlington, and elsewhere will be hard pressed to offer fall productions. And museums and galleries across the state, including in Woodstock, Brattleboro, Bennington, Shelburne, and Stowe are struggling as to when they can welcome visitors again.

Emergency relief dollars from the federal CARES Act of $800,000 is being distributed through the Vermont Arts and Vermont Humanities councils, but this is not sufficient to stabilize the field. The governor has proposed a $400 million economic recovery package. However, the arts are peripheral in the plan and need to be deemed as essential as retail, food and accommodation services, and agriculture. Grants are needed far more than low interest loans. Even with skeletal staff, significant overhead costs are being incurred with absolutely no revenue generated at present.

Cultural organizations should also play a more central role in the governor’s $5 million set-aside to encourage Vermonters to explore the state and spend locally. Bread and Puppet Theatre in Glover should be a must-see on everyone’s travel itinerary. And the Hall Art Foundation in Reading is one of our state’s hidden jewels – exhibiting world-renowned artists in exquisite galleries.

As we begin to rebuild our social, economic, and civic lives post-Covid, arts are crucial for our well-being and community vitality. It may take years for the cultural sector to fully recover. Sadly, without significant investment, many anchor organizations may not be able to return – an incalculable loss to civil society. Vermonters need the arts, now more than ever.

Tom Stevens & John Killacky: After a respite from homelessness, now what?

On Friday, March 13, Vermont was faced with an unprecedented question: What do we do in the face of an emergency of the size of the one in front of us, particularly for those without resources who were either living in the street, couch surfing or in congregate settings (shelters), and were considered high-risk “vectors? 

Amazingly, we provided adequate housing for most of our homeless by moving as many people as possible into hotels in order to mitigate contagion. There are currently 1,961 people in hotel rooms across the state, including 273 children. And this strategy worked — as of May 8, there have been no recorded cases of Covid-19 in any of the individuals now housed.

In addition, regional consortiums of community-based groups with innumerable volunteers provided supplemental services to this population, including delivering meals. These organizations banded together in the spirit of “Vermont Strong,” but these nonprofits are working beyond their bandwidth and fiscal capability. 

In our legislative work, we have been keenly aware of the deficiencies in our social safety net, as it applies to emergency shelter, affordable housing, and wrap-around services. We have seen us, as a state, get caught in the vise of budgetary restraint and diminished capacity, even though it is clear that by providing, at the least, four walls and a roof, mitigates many other social issues that come with poverty, food insecurity, and precarious housing.

And here we are, in a global emergency, and we housed every homeless individual and family we found. It was no mean feat, and we honor those who did the work: our nonprofits, Vermont’s Office of Economic Opportunity, Department for Children and Families, and the Agency of Human Services. 

Housing individuals and families in available hotel rooms was the right thing to do, but it is not sustainable. Which leads us to this question: what is the NEXT right thing to do? As the Covid emergency plateaus, it is important to have a humane transition plan. With the coronavirus still active, returning people back into shelters is not the answer and is a public health risk. Therefore, the state is extending hotel vouchers as well as supportive services and food near-term.

The pandemic highlights the need for a more integrated housing system, from emergency shelters to supportive permanent housing solutions – something that has been studied, but not capitalized for years. Current systems are untenable. Covid has shown us Vermont can house its homeless, at least temporarily, now we need to reimagine, reengineer, and build upon recent successes. The Agency of Human Services, with other state departments and housing advocates, is currently developing a “Rehousing Plan” to present to the Legislature.

We have in place an infrastructure that can act upon any plan we put in place, as any plan will essentially be the long-sought desired outcome of the affordable housing sector: to provide housing with dignity and the services needed to succeed with the hardest population to shelter in the state. All agree a Housing First model improves vulnerable lives, lessens support of other public resources, and builds more robust communities. Here are some of the issues discussed:  

  • Better support for non-profit service providers across the state. Level state funding for many have compromised their abilities over the last few years. 

  • Expand rental subsidies and arrearages support, including mobile homes, to maintain housing stability in the near-term as we rebuild the economy.

  • Develop and rehabilitate permanently affordable housing units, so that lower wage income earners are not spending more than 30% of their income on rent. 

  • Expand permanent supportive housing for individuals with complex needs, which will require acquisition of units in an incredibly tight real estate market. 

  • Design, test, and support new and innovative programs by providers to remain responsive to existing and emerging needs. 

How to pay for these programs?

  • Initial estimates calculate about $110 million is needed to jumpstart these efforts and the majority could come from federal Covid relief funds. This includes funding for support services, rental subsidy, assistance and arrearage programs, and capital expenditures. Given the strictures of the use of these funds, these efforts would focus on housing the homeless and providing long-term solutions.

  • Longer-term, we need to examine how state tax credits are utilized to subsidize rental and home ownership opportunities as well as making annual budget decisions supporting these programs. With these investments, we can recognize through data collection and interpretation that we may save money currently allocated for emergency services.

  • Realign Vermont’s property transfer tax funding. Prior to the emergency, the direct allocation from the property transfer tax was just under 50% of the statutory formula, with other funds allocated to the Vermont Housing and Conservation Trust Fund through sources such as the Capital Fund. Money used from the property transfer tax is incredibly effective in creating new affordable housing.

  • Finally, we need to continue to work alongside the administration and our congressional delegation on upcoming stimulus and recovery bills to address unmet needs, secure necessary statutory and regulatory flexibility, enhance the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, HOME Investment Partnerships, and other federal resources.

The opportunity in this crisis will be lost, if in hindsight, we look back and see that we merely interrupted homelessness during this health cataclysm. Everyone deserves a home.

Housing as healthcare

In my committee work, housing and homelessness are two key issues that have been foregrounded when dealing with COVID-19 emergency measures. With input from many stakeholders, the House Committee on General, Housing and Military Affairs worked with the Senate Committee on Economic Development on a bill regarding eviction moratoria and court processes. This bill (S.333) was passed last week in the House.

Details include, beginning with the Governor’s declaration of a state of emergency on March 13 and ending 30 days after the Governor terminates the state of emergency by declaration, residential evictions and foreclosures are stayed until after the end of the emergency period. This does not relieve tenants from the obligations to pay rent and does not apply to uninhabited, abandoned properties. Notices given before the emergency period are also stayed during this time so that no one will lose housing during this public health crisis.

Homelessness mitigation

My committee also received updates on the Herculean efforts the administration and nonprofit service providers did to move as many homeless people as possible out of congregate settings into hotel rooms in order to mitigate contagion. Our area has been central. For those who are sick, isolation (Harbor Place, Shelburne) and recovery (Holiday Inn, South Burlington) sites were made available. And there are now 1,800 people living in hotels across the state, including 250 children. This housing is available through at least May 15, longer if the Governor extends the emergency period.

Regional consortiums of community-based groups with innumerable volunteers collaborated to provide additional support services to this population, including delivering meals. However, these nonprofits are working beyond their bandwidth and fiscal capacity and need additional support. A supplemental appropriations request will also be forthcoming from the administration, once it is clear how much federal subsidy can be used for emergency housing and support services.

It is also important to have a humane transition plan for our most vulnerable population, once the COVID emergency period winds down. While the coronavirus is still active, returning people back into housing shelters is not the answer and is a public health risk. Consequently, the state is looking to extend hotel vouchers as well as supportive services and food supplies near-term. Commissioner of Vermont’s Department for Children and Families, Ken Schatz, in his testimony to my committee wondered, “Can we can come out of the crisis with a better normal?” This pandemic highlights the need for a more integrated housing system, from emergency shelters to supportive permanent housing solutions.

A better normal

Commissioner Schatz’s question about a “better normal” is pertinent to many systemic issues brought to light during this public health cataclysm: broadband disparities, equitable education and healthcare, affordable housing, care for the homelessness and those incarcerated, antiquated IT systems, undercapitalization of nonprofit organizations, transportation needs and workforce development, among others.

As we scramble to stabilize the state’s finances in the final months of the fiscal year ending June 30, next year’s budget will be even more daunting because of significantly lower revenues projected while needs exponentially increase. When we rebuild our social, economic and civic lives, it cannot be how we do more with less, but our guiding principle must be to do better with less. Traditionally, the Legislature adjourns in May or June, but it looks like we will only be able deliver a temporary budget for the first three months of the new fiscal year and then return in August to finalize a viable budget for the remaining three fiscal quarters of FY21.

Lessons from the AIDS Pandemic

In 1981, I was with friends celebrating the Fourth of July weekend at New York’s Fire Island Pines gay enclave when life changed. Buried on page A20 of The New York Times (July 3,1981) was a report about a new condition: “Rare Cancer Seen in 41 Homosexuals.” Doctors in New York and San Francisco diagnosed a form of Kaposi’s Sarcoma cancer normally seen in elderly men suddenly ravaging younger gay males. The article assured us that it was not contagious and that “no cases have been reported to date outside the homosexual community or in women.”

Soon enough, purple lesions of Kaposi Sarcoma became markers of those infected. Panic and fear fueled conspiracy theories and misinformation regarding contagion. Risk groups were first identified as “the 4 H’s”: hemophiliacs, heroin addicts, homosexuals, and Haitians. Another unfounded hypothesis accused the government of creating the pathogen to eradicate the gay and African-American communities.

In 1982, AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) was named by the Centers for Disease Control. It took another three years to develop a blood test for HIV once it was identified as the cause, and almost fifteen years to develop a number of anti-retroviral drugs that, taken in various combinations, turned the disease from a death sentence into a manageable condition. But before that, chaos ruled on the public health front as millions died.

Federal leadership was lacking as the pandemic began to spread. President Reagan did not publicly mentioned AIDS until 1985. Senator Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina) called for quarantining people who tested positive. Then Secretary of Education, William Bennett, suggested that prisoners with the AIDS virus should remain in custody after serving their sentence so they could not take “revenge on society.” Conservative commentator William F. Buckley Jr. asserted in The New York Times: “Everyone detected with AIDS should be tattooed in the upper forearm, to protect common-needle users, and on the buttocks, to prevent the victimization of other homosexuals.”

With inaction, ignorance, and vitriol on the federal level, grassroots efforts organized. Gay Men’s Health Crisis in New York (1982), San Francisco AIDS Foundation (1982), and AIDS Project in Los Angeles (1983) were early examples of communities mobilizing information, support, treatment, and advocacy.

In these initial years, without any substantive information, friends, families, and medical staff did not know how contagious the disease was, so the sick were isolated. However, many frontline medical workers were heroic. Soon enough, community heart circles began to provide home healthcare and hospice. These then morphed into weekly memorial services for our lost ones. My lived experience of this era is still quite raw. My notebooks list 119 lost to AIDS.

I worry that we haven’t learned very much about the importance of scientific information and compassion in these early days of responding to COVID-19. Not only here in Vermont, but also on Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, in the Hamptons and other east coast resort areas, social media posts warn second homeowners not to return, fearing they will use up scarce resources. Second homeowners are vital to many towns and states’ economies and they too are neighbors. Vermont Governor Scott’s directive to “Stay Home / Stay Safe” applies in whatever home we are in.

Already some European countries and China are discussing the dystopian notion of testing citizens to allow those showing immunity to return to work, even though researchers have yet to determine if the presence of coronavirus antibodies correlates with immunity and how long lasting it is. Best to let science catch up here. These COVID passports could separate the weak from the strong, the old from the young. Marginalization and stigmatization did not work in the AIDS crisis and it seems too early on in this disease to choose societal over individual rights.

We now all live with COVID-19. As we begin to mourn the dead, we will also need to embrace the survivors among us. May information sharing, self-care, community support, and advocacy continue to flourish in the dark days ahead.

Bringing their best selves forward

What an extraordinary moment we are living through. Daily, our lives are ever more upended. As one of your elected legislators, I am privileged to witness first-hand heroic efforts - so many are stepping up in profound ways. 

The Statehouse has been closed to the public, but legislative work continues. We have been meeting virtually since recessing on March 13 through conference calls and video chat - publicly available to everyone to listen in and observe. Last week, members of the House and Senate did go back to Montpelier to pass emergency recovery packages and all committees worked online through Zoom meetings available on YouTube.

Under the adept stewardship of Senate Pro Tem Tim Ashe and Speaker of the House Mitzi Johnson, the Joint Rules Committee meets by phone with various State Departments to receive updates of ever-evolving responses to this unprecedented crisis. Business disruption, childcare, corrections, testing, evictions, grocery and retail, homeless Vermonters, hospitals, judiciary, licensing, liquor, foreclosures, motor vehicles, municipal governments, nursing homes, prescriptions, schools, taxes, telemedicine, unemployment insurance, and utility disconnection are some of the issues the legislature and administration are working together on to help Vermont weather this crisis. 

The Governor’s team has been remarkable, working tirelessly and resiliently to respond to the exponential volatility of the pandemic. They personify the inspirational humanity at play here in Vermont. And how can we ever be thankful enough for those frontline healthcare and support workers putting their own lives at risk saving the most vulnerable among us. 

As I spend more time at home, I am also reminded how dependent we are on the unsung heroes staffing grocery stores, sanitation pick-up, postal workers, utilities and plumbing repair, emergency food and shelter, bus, taxi, and delivery drivers, childcare providers, farmers, journalists, pharmacists, neighbors checking in on each other, and myriad others holding our communities together. Police, fire, EMT, and city workers are extraordinary. Leaders don’t get to choose their battles. There are so many to be grateful for as they bring their best selves forward serving others.

The financial and emotional collateral damage of this pandemic will escalate in the coming weeks. Thousands of friends and colleagues have been laid off and more will be getting sick. The Governor’s “Stay Home, Stay Safe” order directed the closure of in-person operations for all non-essential businesses to be in effect until at least April 15, 2020. As well, school buildings are closed until summer with students learning at home.

Continuing equal measures of self-care and community support will be essential as we balance protecting public safety and restoring the economy. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s words seem apt: “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

As we slow the spread, flatten the curve, and save lives, the legislature will be grappling with the catastrophic impact on our state’s economic systems as well. Delaying payment of rooms and meals taxes and other short-term measures will ease immediate pressures for individuals and businesses, but result in what the Joint Fiscal office projects could be $145 million less in the fourth quarter of this fiscal year for essential services in our downsizing economy. 

Emergency measures will be fast tracked, but the budget, revenue, capital, and transportation bills, among others, are also essential for the ongoing day-to-day operations of our state. In the unsettled days ahead, I am certain Vermonters will continue to hold each other dear. Be well and stay in touch.

Working to ensure dignity and a safety net for all who need it

In the first half of this session, priority in my committee (General, Housing, & Military Affairs) was given to a number of bills and a resolution affirming the humanity and dignity of marginalized populations, with testimony received from myriad stakeholders, including those with lived experience. Here are a few of the issues taken up.

We worked on a joint resolution apologizing and expressing regret to all Vermonters harmed as a result of discredited eugenics research, and its sterilization and institutionalization policies. Eugenics was a dark chapter in Vermont history. Members of Abenaki bands, Vermonters of mixed racial or French-Canadian heritage, the poor, and people with disabilities were targeted.

Children were removed from families, people were incarcerated or institutionalized, family connections were lost and the sense of kinship and community was destroyed. In 2019, UVM issued a statement of apology for its “unethical and regrettable” eugenics role. This resolution is an important opportunity for the House to apologize for the harm the eugenics movement caused.

In the House, our focus is to create a Vermont that works for all of us, not just a select few. My committee worked to develop a Homeless Bill of Rights (H.492). The bill protects people without homes (or perception thereof) against discrimination and includes them in the state’s protected classes. Congruent with Vermont’s constitution stating Vermonters are “equally free and independent” and all are entitled to the same benefits and protections, the legislative intent of this bill is that a person’s rights, privileges, or access to public services may not be denied of abridged solely because they are without housing.

As Vermont grapples with the unprecedented crisis of people struggling with substance use disorders, Recovery Residences are a key component of treatment alternatives. Studies indicate the need for more than 1,000 additional beds, and communities are working hard to meet the needs of those with substance use disorders. I introduced legislation (H.783) whose intent is to expand the number of recovery beds available.

My bill creates state-wide definitions and detailed expectations and operational policies. Recovery residence operators are asking for this. Next, it addresses zoning for these homes as single-family residential use. This clarity is essential for both operators and communities. Guidelines and policies for temporary and permanent removal is also addressed to allow a fair due process for both tenants and landlords, balancing individual and community rights.

I continue to learn about the complex realities of recovery from advocates, operators, state administrators from the departments of health, housing and corrections as well as people challenged with substance use disorders. Visiting South Burlington’s Suburban Square women’s home run by the Vermont Foundation of Recovery illustrated the benefits these kinds of recovery residences provide. The bill was voted out of my committee affirmatively and now resides with the Human Services Committee for their review.

I was disappointed that the House of Representatives could not override the governor’s veto of paid family and medical leave. However, I was heartened that both the Senate and House could override his veto of increasing the minimum wage of two years to $12.55. Forty thousand of our lowest paid workers deserve this raise if we are to have a fair and equitable Vermont.

First month back in the State House

When the legislature reconvened for the second year of the biennium on January 7, there were a number of issues carried over from last spring. The Senate had approved an amendment to the state constitution and the House voted (145-0) to reaffirm that slavery and indentured servitude are prohibited in Vermont. Because this is a constitutional amendment, both the Senate and the House will have to vote again in the next biennium and then this issue will be put on the statewide ballot for voters to decide.

Two major issues, raising the minimum wage and a paid family and medical leave insurance program, had not reach agreement with both the House and Senate before last spring’s recess, so Committees of Conference were assigned with three members from each body negotiating agreements. Both were affirmed and sent to the Governor’s desk.

The Committee of Conference compromise for Paid Family and Medical Leave (H.107) provides 12 weeks of bonding for each parent; 8 weeks for family care; and 6 weeks of voluntary, opt-in benefits for the employee’s own illness. Benefit amounts, contribution rates, employee eligibility, program administration, implementation, and studies were included.

Regarding minimum wage, I had the honor of serving on the Committee of Conference (S.23), along with South Burlington’s Senator Michael Sirotkin, that increases the current rate of $10.96 to $11.75 in January 2021 and $12.55 in January 2022. As part of this bill, the Office of Legislative Council and Joint Fiscal Office will report on minimum wage for tipped, student, and agricultural workers. These studies will help committees of jurisdictions delve more deeply into how Vermonters are compensated.

Passing this much-needed incremental increase impacts 40,000 of our lowest paid workers. An individual working full-time at minimum wage will receive approximately $5,000 more in wages over the next two years. This is also a gender equity issue, as women are a disproportionate share of workers currently earning less than $11 per hour.

Last week, the Governor vetoed family leave and at press time it was unclear what he was going to do with minimum wage. If he vetoes both bills, the two chambers will need two-thirds of their members to override.

While not voting on the floor of the House, I was in committee (General, Housing, and Military Affairs) listening to introductions on bills regarding collective bargaining rights, year-round daylight savings time, sports wagering, and a homeless bill of rights, among other issues. Reports were delivered from the Commissioners of Liquor and Lottery and the State Treasurer on Housing Funding and Finance. As well, a joint hearing was held with the Human Services Committee on Homeless Awareness Day.

Two bills, I am co-sponsoring on compliance for gender-free bathrooms (H.556) and defining, certifying, compliance, and zoning for recovery residences (H.783) were introduced. I will report on these in future columns as they progress in the legislature.

Community meetings were aplenty, including participating on the marketing committee to support the new library’s fundraising campaign. And on Monday last week, I attended a breakfast with the Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce followed by a legislative forum with Kidsafe Collaborative. Later that afternoon, I met with art teachers at South Burlington High School before the monthly legislative meeting with constituents at the library.

Where art and legislation meet

As Vermont’s Legislature only meets January through May, I look forward to returning to work full-time on political matters. My off-season has been busy with constituent meetings, committee hearings, fiscal briefings, conferences and community events. I also taught a class at Champlain College this fall.

Artistically, I curated an exhibition of Vermont photographer Dona Ann McAdams that opened in Brattleboro in June then traveled to Rutland. Next month, it will be seen in St. Johnsbury with future stops in Stowe, Burlington and New York. I completed a short video project, elegies, featured in an exhibition, Love Letters, opening at Helen Day Art Center in Stowe Jan. 16.

Curating a 45-year retrospective of Dona Ann McAdams’s photography (donaannmcadams.com) was a year-long process of researching her archives, augmented with ongoing conversations with the artist and curators from the hosting institutions. The exhibition grew ever richer with input from others.

My video work, too, is collaborative. New York-based choreographer Eiko Otake and I wanted to create elegies to our dead mothers. We invited Brian Stevenson, production manager at Vermont PBS to join us (https://vimeo.com/375048275). The three of us worked together on script development, lighting, sound, camera shots and editing – a seamless process that improved the finished work.

I mention these projects because I believe my artistic practice parallels legislative actions. Moving bills from drafting to committee deliberations onto floor votes in both the House and Senate is also an iterative collaborative process informed by myriad voices – stakeholders, advocates, community members and other legislators, in addition to the governor. Bills constantly evolve and change. Compromise may be the best that can be achieved, given conflicting input, needs and resources.

Priority issues identified by South Burlington residents in a recent legislative survey include minimum wage, paid family leave and climate change – all requiring innovative solutions. We should see a moderate path forward on raising the minimum wage. Initially proposed was raising the base wage to $15 per hour over five years; more likely we will see a two- or three-year window with smaller increases.

The paid family and medical leave insurance program also has been scaled back considerably after an impasse last session. Federal employees now qualify for 12 weeks of paid leave. Last month the governor offered 8,500 state employees six weeks of paid leave. This is significantly less than current legislative proposals.

Hopefully, the artistry of politics will play out with a resolution benefiting all Vermonters.

Legislators and the administration are working together to combat our climate crisis. The governor presented a draft memorandum of understanding for Vermont to join 11 neighboring states and the District of Columbia in a regional compact capping carbon pollution from transportation, charging fossil fuel companies fees and returning that money to participating states.

Choreographing a path forward on this multi-state framework will truly require inventive alliances. This is not a carbon tax, but a cap-and-invest program, the proceeds used to invest in equitable, efficient, affordable and cleaner transportation options and workforce development in a revamped green economy. Comments and testimony are to be taken on the draft with a decision expected this spring.

In politics, as in art, vexing problems are best tackled from multiple perspectives with stakeholders involved. Resiliency and adaptability are also essential for best outcomes in life, art and politics. I look forward to calling upon the artist within during this legislative session.

Going back into session

Next month, legislators return to Montpelier with many pressing issues still in play during this second year of the biennium. I serve on the General, Housing, and Military Affairs Committee. Here are some things I drafted bill requests for: streamlining regulations for recovery homes, studying how tipped employees, students and agricultural workers are compensated, updating employment statutes to eliminate out-of-date and obsolete provisions, and creating an enforcement process for a previous bill requiring all single use bathrooms be listed as gender neutral. 

Two issues that originated in my committee, raising the minimum wage and establishing a paid family leave insurance program will be high priorities to be addressed in January. There were significant differences between the Senate and House chambers on these issues last spring, but a moderate path forward seems to be the consensus. 

As well, the legislature is wanting to more proactively address climate change. Please join me and your other state legislators on December 9 at Frederick Tuttle Middle School from 6:30 - 8 pm to discuss how all of us can do our part to combat climate change. As a member of the Climate Solutions Caucus, we had many conversations over the summer and are eager to get your input as how to create a more sustainable future for our state.  

Much will be discussed at the forum, including how Vermont can encourage reduction of carbon emissions, create economic opportunity through a Green Economy, improve transportation equity, and continue efforts with building thermal efficiencies – all factors in reducing climate changing pollution. Potential legislation under consideration will be previewed.

Other issues I worked on over the summer include improving conditions at South Burlington’s Women’s Prison with the Women’s Legislative Caucus. As a member of the Tourism Caucus, we investigated how the state can increase its support for destination marketing, given the importance of tourism to Vermont’s economy. I am particularly interested in how the creative sectors can be further highlighted in rural communities.

 I pulled together a meeting with thirteen other state legislators from Chittenden County with the leadership of the National Guard regarding the arrival of the full fleet of F-35’s next spring and the cumulative sound impact. A group of us subsequently met with airport officials about their application to the FAA for noise mitigation funding as a result of mapping aircraft noise levels in surrounding neighborhoods of South Burlington, Williston, Winooski, and Burlington. 

Another meeting that was very beneficial was between South Burlington’s City Council and School Board with Representatives and Senators regarding state legislative matters of interest. We are all on the same team – working to improve the lives of those in our community. 

There are myriad other issues percolating in the upcoming session, including taxing and regulating the sale of marijuana so we have adequate resources to protect consumers and reduce youth usage. On December 10, we will be starting up again the monthly Legislative Forum at the South Burlington Library from 6:30 – 8 pm. Since each of your four Representatives, Ann Pugh, Maida Townsend, Martin LaLonde, and I sit on different committees, we will report on significant pieces of legislation in development. We are eager for your input and want to understand your priorities as we go back into session. 

South Burlington's Women's Prison

Last month, I spoke before a Joint Legislative Justice Oversight Committee, sharing concerns raised by inmates in our Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility. As the prison is in my legislative district, I felt it was incumbent to speak on the women’s behalf. I visited the institution three times in recent months, first with the Women’s Caucus, and then in response to letters received from prisoners. 

During my first trip in February, it was clear myriad issues need addressing. Capital improvements are required to upgrade buildings and grounds. Originally built in the 1970s to temporarily house 80 offenders awaiting trial, over 150 women are currently incarcerated here.

If we want these women to be successful rejoining their communities, expanded therapeutic and vocational opportunities are crucial. There are complex physical, emotional and psychological issues present, exasperated by intergenerational trauma. The internal culture of the institution needs to shift to ensure prisoners are not merely warehoused but are supported with nurturing rehabilitation. 

Preparing for reentry is also key. One inmate told me she had “done her time,” but was waiting for space to open up in transitional housing in Rutland. It was unclear how long she was going to have to stay in jail.

In July, I received a lengthy dossier from an inmate detailing a guard’s alleged misconduct. Included were copies of complaints filed. Accompanying this package was a short letter from the inmate’s peer-to-peer Open Ears’ Coach:

“Instead of entering into an environment that is intent on correcting negative social behaviors, she has experienced trauma. She is not alone in this. … This current process available to address staff misconduct does not work. It compromises these women’s safety and mental health; leaving them feeling unheard and without hope.”

I phoned prison Superintendent Theresa Stone and met with her and Assistant Superintendent Lori Perkins. I was told an official investigation of the complaints was done, and that, “the guard still worked here.” I then asked to meet with the Open Ears Coach who had written in her cover letter that many others are “feeling unheard and without hope.”  

Assistant Superintendent Parks and I met with her and she reiterated concerns that women do not feel safe. She herself had filed three complaints and never heard back from the administration. Parks promised she would investigate since these had been filed prior to her employment. Subsequently, the assistant superintendent told me she had gotten back to the woman.

In September, I received another letter. In it, various issues were detailed: “lack of outside recreation … being out of stock of several medications such as antibiotics, antidepressants, and suboxone … and understaffing.” The inmate claimed she was physically assaulted by a guard and filed a report.

With the receipt of this second letter, I emailed Department of Corrections Commissioner Michael Touchette asking for a meeting. He emailed me right back, “If you have information about a lack of safety for women at CRCF, I’d prefer to hear about it now, so we can address any immediate issues.” He sent along his cell number and we spoke on the phone. 

I appreciate the commissioner as well as the superintendent and assistant superintendent for their responsiveness. In separate conversations, both the commissioner and superintendent mentioned more trauma-informed training was needed for guards. This seems imperative. Furthermore, a more transparent complaint process needs to be instituted with inmates hearing back in a timelier manner. 

Capital investment, therapeutic and vocational opportunities, staff training and streamlining the complaint process – we can do better. We must. 

Arts Advocacy through a politician’s lens

My entire career has been as an artist and arts administrator. Forty-five years ago, I was dancing in Chicago, New York, and Winnipeg. My subsequent work in film and writing has focused on personal narratives around AIDS, disability, and queer identity. I managed dance companies (Laura Dean and Trisha Brown), presented contemporary performing artists (PepsiCo Summerfare and Walker Art Center), ran multidisciplinary presenting organizations (Yerba Buena Center and Flynn Center), and worked in philanthropy (Pew Charitable Trusts and The San Francisco Foundation). In all these positions, I championed artists, community engagement, diversification, inclusion, and access.

Since being elected to the Vermont House of Representatives last fall, my perspective has dramatically changed as to how best advocate for the arts and, in fact, how siloed arts organizations and their funders are. My legislative work focuses on economic development, tourism, heath, education, affordable housing, environment, and agriculture, as well as vulnerable populations: veterans, prisoners, the homeless, those suffering from substance use disorders, and survivors of physical and sexual abuse. Art is barely present in these conversations, but is so needed.

Those of us with lived experience understand the profound transformative power of the arts; yet this does not resonate in a broader community context, especially for those disenfranchised. Art is still perceived as a luxury for the privileged, not a necessity for all. Cultural organizations need to recalibrate efforts and partner with local, regional, and national agencies of health and human services, education, agriculture, housing authorities, prisons, national parks, veterans affairs, and the environment in order to develop strategies for how the arts can be more fully integrated into their efforts.

There are many exemplar organizations that model this kind of service as central to their missions: Rhodessa Jones’ Medea prison project, Jazz House Kids, Appalshop, Vermont Abenaki Artists Association, Alliance for California Traditional Arts, Alternate Roots, First People’s Fund, Project Row Houses, Urban Bush Women, Axis Dance Company, and others. For these groups, authentic community engagement is a core commitment to nurture vibrant communities.

National arts funders, too, must continue to evolve funding criteria. While many have rightfully focused on racial equity and social justice to redress systemic racism, arts philanthropy also needs to address poverty as a central barrier. There is so much lost potential when arts funders don’t collaborate with other program area portfolios even within their own foundations. Integrating the arts into ongoing anti-poverty work is crucial.

Living now in a rural state, I witness the devastating realities of income inequality. People living through generational destitution, addiction, and trauma need the arts to help with healing. More money is not needed to diversify audiences for major institutions; investments need to be made to enable all community members to be enriched by art and culture in order to live more resilient lives.

Our community, working together for positive results

This summer I was inspired by the myriad ways our community works together. Good food and great company were had when Champlain Housing Trust hosted a cookout for residents of O’Dell Apartments. Brett Leonard and his team from South Burlington Recreation and Parks did the cooking, Kelly Kendall from South Burlington Public Library was there with the bookmobile bus and police were handing out ice pops. 

I attended the graduation ceremony for women from Lund who completed their high school education. Lund is such an extraordinary local organization working to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and abuse by supporting pregnant and parenting teens, young adults and adoptive families. Other women from Lund were also honored in the celebration held at Vermont Commons School. 

During the party, I remembered attending Burlington’s Treatment Court last year. Participants take part in counseling, attend court hearings and follow program guidelines in order to have criminal charges dismissed or reduced. At that hearing, the family judge congratulated one young woman on the birth of her child and for being accepted into Lund housing. At the ceremony I just attended, this woman and her beautiful child were honored for the incredible progress she’s made. Testimony that lives can indeed be saved with compassionate social services. 

I also twice visited South Burlington’s women’s prison and wish that our ill-equipped, under-resourced facility and the criminal justice system could better serve those incarcerated and their families so that these women succeed when they rejoin our communities. Some women don’t feel safe and need more therapeutic and vocational opportunities. 

Stopping by the Thursday morning Rotary Club meeting, I heard about plans to provide back-to-school backpacks filled with supplies to students in need. Later that afternoon, I met with the South Burlington crew of Vermont Youth Conservation Corps, who removed the invasive species of buckhorn in Wheeler Park. As we gathered under a 200-year old oak tree, it was impressive to hear from the youth about their experiences conserving forest lands.

That same evening, I attended a joint meeting of the South Burlington City Council and Planning Commission and listened to reports from various committees volunteering their time to study how South Burlington can continue to encourage development while balancing environmental impact, conservation and affordable housing needs. Committees asked for more time to complete their extensive scope of work, and the city’s interim zoning pause on development was extended for a few months.  

The UVM Medical Center hosted a morning breakfast meeting at the Doubletree Hotel featuring a number of organizations collaborating to deliver integrated early childhood and family care on a statewide, regional and local level. The early results of these innovative partnerships are impressive indeed as the first few years of a child’s life are so very crucial to physical, intellectual and emotional development.

Finally, I attended a full day Social Justice Caucus retreat in White River Junction with legislators and activists trying to be more intentional about developing inclusive political, social, economic and ecological policies for Vermont. What an honor it is to be your citizen legislator and how lucky I am to learn from and participate in all of these community dialogues. 

Thanks to those who stopped by and visited our “Ask Your Legislators” table at the Aug. 15 SoBu Nite Out concert at Veterans Memorial Park.

Minimum wage, paid leave vital to families

Frustratingly, two bills I worked on in committee did not make it to the finish line this spring in Montpelier: increasing the minimum wage and establishing a paid family and medical leave insurance program.They were held up in negotiations between the House and Senate in the final weeks of the session. However, I believe better legislation will result when we return to work in January. There were too many issues unresolved. 

Raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour over a five-year period was seen as too fast for some, and not soon enough for others. Market forces in some urban areas had already accelerated wages above the prevailing $10.78, but small rural businesses worried about any further increases. 

Home health agencies, nursing homes, residential care homes, assisted living residences and adult day care agencies reported that, without additional Medicaid support, increasing the minimum wage would be onerous. Another factor, raising wages incrementally without adjusting eligibility for governmental supplemental programs, could create a “benefits cliff,” leaving some folks worse off short-term. 

Further consideration has to be given to how tipped employees, students and agricultural workers are compensated. As well, Vermont’s employment statutes need to be modernized to eliminate out-of-date and obsolete provisions, particularly regarding people with disabilities.

Complexity also played out in developing a paid family and medical leave insurance program. The governor’s voluntary program was introduced but not taken up, because a different bill was already in process in the House. At the session’s end, there remained significant differences between the House and Senate versions on this issue.  

Should the program be funded jointly by employers and employees? Both the House and Senate left that up to the discretion of employers. How much time is adequate for family bonding? The House thought 12 weeks for each parent for a total of 24; the Senate landed on 16 weeks shared between parents. 

Length of allowable family care time of up to eight weeks was in both versions, but differences for personal medical leave were eight weeks in the House, while the Senate provided up to six weeks of personal medical leave only to employees who elected to obtain coverage by paying an additional premium. Both chambers agreed that cumulative time off should be capped at 12 weeks in any given year.

Increasing the minimum wage and a paid family and medical leave insurance program are both essential to the viability of Vermont’s future, particularly in attracting young families and a more vibrant workforce.  Low-income Vermonters desperately need a raise. Forty-one percent of minimum-wage workers are considered “head of the household” and the majority of them are women. Too many scramble, juggling multiple part-time jobs to adequately feed, clothe and shelter themselves and their families. Increasing salaries is a shrewd investment, ultimately decreasing the costs of the social safety net long-term; not to be discounted is the additional consumer spending in local communities. 

Families should not have to suffer economic and professional hardships while raising children. Both parents deserve adequate bonding time with new ones. And baby boomers, too, need a break, struggling to care for themselves, ailing parents, and grandchildren in crisis. Few mind paying for Social Security and for disability, health, or unemployment insurance; another small premium to ensure paid family and medical leave seems like a wise investment each of us and employers can make. Happy and healthy employees tend to remain loyal, and retention is more cost-effective than turnover.

Arts and the Creative Economy

Since the legislature adjourned in late May, I have been busy with arts-related projects around the state: attending a conference about Creative Communities in Montpelier, opening an exhibition I curated at Brattleboro Museum and Art Center, visiting Vermont Studio Center in Johnson, speaking at the Governor’s Institute on the Arts at Castleton University and participating in a workshop in Salisbury. I enjoyed free events during Burlington’s Discover Jazz Festival and saw compelling theater in Waterbury Center’s refurbished Grange Hall Cultural Center. How pleasant it is for me to drive, windows down, amidst verdant fields – my favorite time of year.

On my road trips, I was reminded how essential cultural organizations are to the vitality of each of their communities, and how the arts are, in fact, economic drivers in urban and rural economic development. The Flynn Center, which I ran before becoming your legislator, employs 300+ people with an annual payroll of over $2.8 million. The Vermont Arts Council recently released a study showing that the creative economy in the Northeast Kingdom employs 3,327 individuals, 9.4 percent of the workforce of 35,500. The Arts Council is expanding its research state-wide to illustrate how substantial the arts sector is in each community.

As a legislator, I feel Vermont can do more for the arts. Few cities and towns, including South Burlington, provide direct support to artist residents. This year, the Vermont Arts Council received an appropriation of $717,735 from the state. This money matches federal dollars and provides small grants to artists and arts organizations. Additional dollars, locally and statewide, can have transformative impacts. 

As we seek to encourage younger people to relocate here, added support for the cultural sector will make our region even more attractive and deliver immense returns on investment. Additionally, increased funding for the Vermont Department of Tourism can expand promotion of the vast array of cultural offerings year-round. Our artists, museums, theaters and festivals are world-class and can complement outdoor recreation, agriculture and craft breweries as tourist draws. At my Brattleboro Museum opening last month, so many folks told me they visit the museum three or four times each year from out of state.

Here in South Burlington, arts abound. Katie Baritt’s public art project with community members decorating utility boxes has enlivened our neighborhoods in subtle, yet profound ways – bringing smiles to all as we drive, cycle and walk by. Lines Vermont dance studio just opened its beautiful facilities on Farrell Street. Next week, SoBu’s Nite Out Summer Series begins free music concerts in Veterans Memorial Park. Longer-term, city leaders are discussing the viability of a building a new performing arts center as yet another economic anchor.

In addition to arts-related activities, I had the honor of joining the governor and fellow legislators at Norwich University as we signed a law encouraging veterans to register on the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry. Military Affairs is part of my committee work, and I am proud that we were able to pass this bill into law this session, helping 10,000 Vermont Veterans deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan document the ill health effects of toxic contamination from waste disposal from open air burn pits on bases.